I found the description for “Homeopathy” in google results included controversy text.

For such a small description, one would believe there’s not enough room for quack it or promote it, but there it was.

This is how you penetrate wikepedia, right in front of their editors

After (me) being hated by some of the editors, the description miraculously changed to a plain description, but nobody said “I did” or “Oops”, yet I’m still waiting for an official answer to my request to edit a HIDDEN section even the editors didn’t know exists. : The “Lede” or lead. You need to add special query parameters in the address bar to see it (&secion=0 if the page is not marked as “controversial” or somehow blocked) like this lede for furniture

One answer was

How many times do we have to say this: ‘we have no control over what Google does’

The lede, is what the crawler reads, but IT’S NOWHERE IN THE USER PAGE, it’s only seen by bots.
Although Wikipedia is believed to be neutral, and open, the lede is not even seen in your browser, nor the main “edit” page.
If you thought you can at least control what others do, think again.

That page is locked, and you have to (more…)

Este artículo se podría llamar tambien “Como sus truquitos de posicionamiento web benefician nuestros servicios de internet marketing” (y al final de este artículo “como saber si Ud será el próximo afectado”)

Hay un montón de artículos por ahi, acerca de porqué “black hat SEO” (truquitos de posicionamiento web) dañarán su presencia web, pero éste va directamente a las pruebas mas definitivas.

¿Dónde se puede poner el medidor para estar seguro que es la prueba definitiva, final, de que han habido daños a su presencia en la web? ¿En los libros de balance? ¿En la cuenta de adwords? Piense en algo mas lejos…

Nuestro signo es el más lejano que pueda encontrar, en la cadena de eventos desafortunados: (more…)